Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Thursday, October 28, 2010

We think the Revolution is a Revolution

Part A: My section was from page 316 to the end of the text. In “Lest We Think the Revolution Is a Revolution”, Cynthia L. Selfe creates a very stereotyped way of living for men and women. She comments on what men specifically wear and how they act in and out of work. She says that in work they are the “successful architect-net-cruiser” and once they are out of work, they are like every other man in “traditional and retrograde roles of bikers, nerds, and sex maniacs” (Selfe 316). I think she is just stereotyping here, and saying that men just look at the media and imitate what they see. For women she says its easier to play the role of a mother, seductress or beauty. This is all about playing rolls for Selfe, and how it is just easier to play the roll of something than to play against it. If you really wanted to play against it though, I think it would be simple to do that.

Part B: Selfe at one point says “It will be exceedingly difficult for Americans to imagine an electronic landscape in which individuals enjoy new kinds of opportunities to relate to each other and new kinds of opportunities to make positive changes in their lives” (Selfe 316). I believe that Selfe is trying to say that it will be hard to adapt to change. That Americans still want to play the roll of the male going to work, coming home and relaxing, and the female looking all motherly. I think she is also trying to say that if we allow it to change, if we give it the opportunity to change, than we can make it something positive in our life.

No comments:

Post a Comment