Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Sunday, October 31, 2010

Revolution Summery and Claims

In Cynthia L. Selfe's paper, Lest We Think the Revolution is a Revolution, she writes about how Americans, and specifically English educators, want computers to make the world a better place to live in. Selfe says, “We hope computers can help make us, and the students with whom we work, more productive in the classroom and other instructional settings more effective as communicators and more responsibly involved as literate citizens in the world affairs.” Pg.(293) What Selfe is saying is that she hopes that computers will help make Americans learn better and make then want to be more involved with things other then themselves. She then goes on to state from Howard Rheingold, The Virtual Community, that, “computer networks can support more citizens in their efforts to communicate with government agencies, corporations, political groups, and information resources.” Pg.(293) Selfe is saying that when Americans learn more from computers, they will be able to be more in contact with government and other positions of control. Selfe then goes on to explain the first narrative, which is the global village and the electronic colony. Selfe says that technology will, “help us create a global village in which the people of the world are all connected.” Pg.(294) What Selfe is saying is that technology will make a program that will be able to bring everyone in the world together in a single place. Selfe believes that Americans are the leaders of technology. She states that, “Americans are the smart ones who use technological expertise to connect the worlds people, to supply them with the technology and train them to use it.” Pg.(295) What she is saying is that since Americans are the best with technology then they should be the people to lead this global village. Her second narrative is about the land of equal opportunity and the land of difference. In this part she talks about how advertisements make it look like America is open towards everybody. She says, “This landscape, Americans like to believe, is open to everybody-male and female, regardless of color, class, or connection.” Pg.(301) Selfe is saying that Americans think that America is the best place to live because it gives everybody an opportunity to live and try new things. She then says that, “America is the land of opportunity only for some people.” Pg.(304) What she means is that America has had its history of slavery and discrimination and immigration laws. We have had problems with women suffrage and poverty and education. Her third narrative is about the un-gendered utopia and the same old gendered stuff. In this part of her writing she talks about how women are portrayed and how men are put into positions of power. In figure 17 it shows a narcissistic, seductress woman staring into a computer for Samsung. Advertisements would never put a man in her position. In ads and commercials they portray women as seductress and secretary's while putting men in jobs as bosses and other powerful spots.

Claim 1: Quite simply put, like many Americans, we hope computers can help us make the world a better place to live.

Evidence: In Selfe's writing she says that “We hope computers can help make us, and the students with whom we work, more productive in the classroom and other instructional settings more effective as communicators and more responsibly involved as literate citizens in the world affairs.” Pg.(293) This supports her claim because if computers can make us more effective as communicators then we could talk about problems instead of fighting about them.

Claim 2: As much as Americans might like to think it; technology is not the only solution for all of the world’s problems-and, indeed, might well be a contributing cause to many of them.

Evidence: Technology isn't the only option for problems that the world has. Americans should be able to come up with other ways to solve conflicts.

No comments:

Post a Comment