Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Sunday, October 31, 2010

Lest we think the revolution is a revolution, re-read summary

In Cynthia Selfe’s article, “Lest We Think the Revolution is a Revolution,” she explains the three major Narratives that Americans usually misconceive. The three American Narratives are: the “global village” (pp. 294), the “land of equal opportunity” (pp. 301) and the “un-gendered utopia” (pp. 305). The “global village” is the concept that technology will connect everyone in the world through communication to cooperate for the commonweal. The “land of equal opportunity” is the American belief that the internet and electronic technology is a sort of landscape in which everyone has equal shares in and has a right to. The final Narrative, the “un-gendered utopia,” is another conception that electronic technology will help create a utopic society in which there is no discrimination of any kind. These narratives are all however wrong. The reality is that technology is only available to some people and geared towards males, thus crushing the conception of the Narratives.

In regards to the “global village” narrative, Selfe describes the American fears of , “Becoming just another member of the tribe, just another citizen of the global village, suggests the possibility that Americans could be asked to relinquish their current priviledge status in the world…” (pp. 294). This claim suggests that Americans are actually hypocritical in the thought of the “global village” because we wouldn’t want to relinquish our “top dog” status over the other societies in the world and move down or bring them up to the American level or social status. This is Selfes defense on the claim that the American conception of the “global village” is wrong. Another of Selfe’s claims is, “All these things remind us that opportunity is a commodity generally limited to privileged groups within this country” (pp. 304). This claim is in support of the claim, “-that America is the land of opportunity only for some people” (pp. 304). Through these claims, Selfe promotes the idea that the American Narrative of the “land of equal opportunity” is a false Narrative because it is only true for some people. These claims are supported by the history of slavery, immigration, women’s suffrage and labor unions.

No comments:

Post a Comment