Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Lest We think the Revolution is a Revolution

In Cynthia L. Selfe's essay "Lest We Think the Revolution is a Revolution: Images of Technology and the Nature of Change", the topic of gender roles comes up in pages 309-322. Even though ads that portray women may seem to focus on selling the product, it doesn't hide its intent of using women's seduction to sell. This in turn makes women seem as seductresses. The ad in figure 17 barely focus' on the TV, in fact i didn't even notice the TV that they were trying to sell. It focus' on the woman in the ad. Women in ads are portrayed as housekeepers, assistants, mothers and other positions of limited power. Men, however, are portrayed as bosses, business owners, and other positions of power. Even though they both can use technology equally well. In her essay, Selfe writes, "It takes energy and careful thinking to create a landscape in which women can participate in roles other than those of seductress, beauty, or mother; and in which men don't have to bikers or abusers or rabid techno geeks or violent sex maniacs. It is far easier and more comfortable simply to re-construct for ourselves those traditional narratives that tell the same old gender stories over and over again, and that re-create the status quo ever more clearly in their re-telling. (pages 316 & 321)" What Selfe is saying here is that its going to be difficult and time consuming to change our society to allow different roles for men and women. We aren't predestined by our gender. However, its going to be especially hard to change when we have the far easier option of just conforming to the gender stories.

No comments:

Post a Comment