Welcome!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
Monday, November 15, 2010
Deshpande
In the article "The Confident Gaze" by Shekhar Deshpande he talks about the subject of National Geographic and how they sanitize their photographs so they capture the eye of the reader. Deshpande explains how the magazine is such an accomplished piece then goes on to the darker side of it. He explains a photo taken in India as Deshpande puts it, "the section shows the Western white man resting on the side panels of the vehicle while three young women from the hills of the North serve as his 'props'."(par 5) What Deshpande seems to be doing here is he is seeing the photograph as prejudice. His article then explains that there is an innocent attractiveness of the photography from National Geographic. In Deshpande's words, "It attempts to sanitize and universalize the incomfortable as well as different elements of other cultures."(par 8) What he means is that National Geographic makes the rest of the world look like good to the Westerner's eye. They can make the worst things like the wall between Palestine and Israel look good for the white man's enjoyment. In Desphande's view, "Human suffering becomes worth a good image. The hunger with which the photographer's eye looks at the world consumes those images that are transferable into a nascent and yet techincally perfect photographs."(par 10) Deshpande's article goes on to explain how these images gives power to the magazine. When they are photographing something terrible they just beautify it for our eyes so it is as Deshpande says "digestible"(par 12). This makes the photographs dishonest and the content is warped. Deshpande states, "This power to transform the most repulsive results of human actions around the world into images that are digestible is what makes for the culture of National Geographic."(par. 12)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment