Welcome!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
Monday, November 15, 2010
Nation Geografic's India vs. India's India
The confident Gaze by Shekhar Deshponde brings to light an important issue. He has an extreme claim that National Geographic is covering up truth and exploiting people all over the world for the pleasure of the western eye. Deshpodees article highlights the magazine's May 1997 issue India turning Fifty . Deshpone accuses the photographers of not telling the whole story. He says, "From he worn out bricks to the tobacco stains on the teeth the photographers are rich in their content, but entirely dishonest in their relationship to the environment or the context. It is as if that world needs to be posed in the appropriate way to the westerns observer, he could not see it in it's bare essentialities"(par13). He is saying National Geographic is misrepresenting reality. The pictures in the magazine are all about looking beautiful and artistic. One example of the artistic photograph is on the cover of the India Turning Fifty issue. The picture is a close up of a boy covered with red Holli paint. The image has sharp eye catching contrasts with the boys clear dark eyes, the red paint and a rustic grey wall behind him. To the western eye he looks so interesting and mysterious. This sets him apart as different. Set against the grey wall it seems his life is rustic and definitely not modern. The boy has a sort of curious look on his face that could make the westerner feel like he is unfamiliar with the technology of the camera. All this makes for a strikingly interesting image. Look a bit deeper. The boy must be around 9 or 10 at least. It doesn't look like he is having fun but from the paint you can tell is must be the religious holiday were you go around throwing colorful paint on everyone. The boy looks so unnatural standing there not smiling. He should be running around throwing paint on people with his friends. look a bit deeper still. The boy's thin hollow face looks like he is probably malnourished. His lips look cracked and dry which might indicate other heath issues. But the picture is not saying "help make sure this boy has clean watter" it is saying "Look how exotic he is". Deshponde comments that. "[National Geographic] is quite sensitive to trouble spots and trouble contexts; it dose not pretend to evade such situations. But while it covers or represents such issues or situations, it can sanitize and even beautify the blood and the gore of the conflict"(par12). Deshpode goes on to accuse the west of using suffering as entertainment. Concerning the article on India he says. " It provides innocuous details of life in India, without any reference tot he real troubles of the people or the global conditions in which the country is implicated in"(par20). He is saying National; geographic has a very narrow lens and is not helpful to truly understand what is going on around the world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment