Welcome!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Deshpande’s Summery with quotes
Summery: Shekhar Deshpande’s article, “The Confident Gaze” is about what National Geographic does to get the pictures that everyone wants to see. Deshpande himself says, “[h]uman suffering becomes worth a good image”. In other words Deshpande believes the photographers for National Geographic will do anything for a “good” photo. I don’t think National Geographic should take pictures that aren’t real or are misleading because we need to know the truth about human suffering so we know how to help those who are suffering. Deshpande says “It is slick, it is technically flawless or even adventurous, and it attempts sanitize and universalize the uncomfortable as well as different elements of other cultures”. In other words Deshpande believe we try to change whatever we think is not “normal”. I think we are stupid to want to change other cultures because people take pride in their own culture and I don’t think it is are right to take that pride away. Deshpande goes on to talk about how National Geographic beatifies situations so they don’t look as bad. They are censoring what we see and not showing us gruesome details. Deshpande explains how the western culture sees other cultures and how judgmental we are. If we don’t like something, we change it. How can we change cultures that are not our own? Deshpande implies that the only thing National Geographic wants to do is satisfy the viewers. I think National geographic can do this with out falsely representing what is really going on in “third world” countries. One of Deshpande’s main points is to respect the “other” world. I don’t think other countries will let you change their culture if you don’t even respect their culture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment