Welcome!

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversations Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?

As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! We encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).

Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!

--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100



Monday, October 11, 2010

Illiterate or not? (Clive Thompson Summary)

In the Clive Thompson’s article, “The New Literacy,” he is discussing an argument of whether kids these days are revolutionizing writing, or if they aren’t, and in fact they are illiterate. He gives the opinion of an English professor from The University College of London, John Sutherland, who states that he believes that “kids today can’t write, and technology is to blame.” Furthermore, he believes that websites like Facebook, and activities like texting and PowerPoint have replaced the meaningful essays kids in the past wrote. Due to these things Sutherland says writing has become “bleak, bald, sad, and shorthanded.” On the opposition, he gives Andrea Lunsford’s (a professor of writing and rhetoric at Stanford University) opinion on the argument. Thompson says that, “from 2001 to 2006, she collected 14,672 student writing samples-everything from in class assignments, formal essays, and journal entries to emails, blog posts, and chat sessions.” She found that young people today are actually not developing bad writing skills, or losing literacy, but they are writing more due to all this technology, she found that only 38 percent of writing occurred in class. She also found that students now days are much better at what’s called “kairos”, kairos is a way of assessing your audience and adapting to their tone and technique to best get your point across. Currently, writing is much more conversational and public, but 50 years ago it was much more essay based. I say that it is neither one of these beliefs of Sutherland and Lunsford; I do believe that we are writing much more as a youth, such as Lunsford states, but we are not writing in the right way. We shorten words, spell them wrong, use slang, and don’t use correct English in almost all the writing we do (Facebook, texting, emails, etc.). Practicing these bad habits all the time, makes them permanent, and makes us worse writers, if we wrote less, but everything we wrote was correct, then we would be excellent writers. Therefore, I say that it’s not how much you write, it’s whether you write correctly or not.

John Critchlow

1 comment:

  1. Very good at bringing up the important things in Thompsons article. You could probably give a little more as far as your opinion goes. Or your view of literacy today. Otherwise, a great essay!

    ReplyDelete